Should sociology be a science essay
Sociology This helps figure out how society thinks. For instance the positivist methods always aim to be scientific, they use detatched methods like non-participant observation and structured interviews, that they they do not let any of their views onto their research.
For instance, in driving if there is a red light cars stop and wait for it to go from red and orange to green before they can go. For instance he did not define exactly what both of them were and so technically all deaths and suicides could be fitting into one or more category, having such blurred lines means we cannot prove the theory wrong because if we decide a suicide does not fit into regulation it could be argued to fit into regulation and cannot not fit into these.
Rank the seven social sciences anthropology, economics, geography, history, political science, psychology, and sociology according to what you believe is their importance and influence on the people in a modern society.
Postmodernists challenge the idea that science produces the truth about the natural world. Therefore sociology can be a science because it holds some of the control systems that science does also.
Sociology is the science of society justify this statement
He believes that sociology does not fulfil either and therefore cannot be one until it does. Also free will is not something that can be studied scientifically it is an unobservable phenomena. According to Sutton some marginal scientists were finding evidence of a link between the burning of fossil fuels and a warming climate in the s, but this was largely dismissed by the scientific community until the s, but today this is widely accepted. For instance the positivist methods always aim to be scientific, they use detatched methods like non-participant observation and structured interviews, that they they do not let any of their views onto their research. Therefore sociology can be a science because the unobservable meanings and motivations can be studied in a scientific way, however in exactly what way maths, testing, physics etc is undecided. For instance post-modernists believe that society and the world now is so fragmented and that there are so many perspectives on everything that truth has now become relative. Contextually at the time, statistics were not as organised so no one would even realise he missed them out. It is dazzling and compelling enterprise, as its subject matter is our own behavior as social beings. He was a liberal, a modernist, and a nationalist. For instance, positivists may believe that Suicide is a social fact and the result only of social and moral regulation and integration and can find this through statistics, but there is always the possibility of finding a statistics that is nether and therefore disproves the theory.
Also they do not actively try to disprove their theory, for instance Durkheim searched for evidence of patterns and trends in suicide across Europe, it is highly likely that when he came across suicide that did not fit he ignored it.
For instance water boiling at degrees is falsifiable because we can test it at various temperatures and see if it boils. For instance the interpretivists have claimed that science cannot study the means and motivations because they are unobservable, and the positivists only study the observable.
Whereas sociology is created through shared meaning, motivations and actions of individuals and therefore involves consciousness which science cannot study validly.
Is sociology a science debate
For instance, positivists may believe that Suicide is a social fact and the result only of social and moral regulation and integration and can find this through statistics, but there is always the possibility of finding a statistics that is nether and therefore disproves the theory. Postmodernists reject the view that we should be scientific in any way, this closes our minds. For instance if you believe that society is an external objective phenomena with structures and determinism and therefore cause and effect it could be possible that sociology could be a science if it maintained falsifiability and objectivity. Answer: 1. It includes basic assumptions about the nature of reality, which limit the kind of questions scientists ask in their research. For instance post-modernists believe that society and the world now is so fragmented and that there are so many perspectives on everything that truth has now become relative. Sociology This helps figure out how society thinks. Realist Views of Science and Open and Closed Systems Sayer suggests that there are two types of science — those which operate in closed systems, such as physics and chemistry, and those which operate in open systems such as meteorology. He was a very ambitious man; this ambition was illustrated by the accomplishments he made over the course of his life. For example Marxism has the idea that eventually the working class will gain class consciousness, realise their exploitation and overthrow the ruling class. Realists alternatively argue that science and sociology can work together because of the controls on research that both use; open and closed systems. However the interpretivists agree with Kuhn in a way, because like Kuhn believes that sociology cannot be a science, they agree that sociology should not even try to be a science because the study of science and the study of the mind are totally different things. Problems like degrading environment and getting MRSA or other super drug resistant bugs in us were not concerns years ago, the risks created in society are greater now because of science. All scientists work under this and research is funded if it best fits the paradigm, sociology does not have one.
Sayer argues that sociology can be scientific in the way meteorology is scientific, but not scientific in the way physics or chemistry can be scientific: Quantitative sociology, for example can reveal hidden structures such as the class structureand make broad predictions about what percentage of people from a lower class background will fail, compared to those from a middle class background, without being able to predict exactly who will fail, and without us being able to SEE that class structure directly.
based on 119 review